Category Archives: Rants and Raves

Chickens in Greeley (and in the Snow)

Holding Chicken in the sky

We are finally progressing on the chicken ordinance in Greeley. Britton and I are on a Greeley ad-hoc committee to make it a little easier for people to have chickens in Greeley. I am coming to the conclusion that the only thing “easier” to having chickens in Greeley is the number. The number of chickens one can have in residential areas will likely increase from 1 per 1/10 of an acre of land (that is all that it says on the books currently about chickens) to up to 6 per residential house with a whole lot more to say on that subject.

For instance:
There will now be a requirement/regulation
-on the size of the coop
-on the size of the run or yard
-on the keeping of the food (in a metal, rat proof container)
-on the color of the coop
-on keeping the coop predator-proof
-on the distance of the coop from property lines
-on closing up the coop at night
-that no roosters are allowed
-that they must be kept away from geese and wild ducks and their excrement
-that slaughtering must be done out-of-sight of neighbors
-that only single-family residences can have chickens

and it wouldn’t be government unless it had, of course, a requirement to apply for a permit whereby they will have an “inspector” come by to tell you if you have met all of the said requirements. To me, I feel like we have lost a lot in the compromise. It’s not that I don’t agree with many of the points, it’s just that it’s a LOT of freaking rules. To raise chickens. Come on. Chickens! They do not take a whole lot to figure out and if you mess up and a predator eats them or you have other problems you will be the first to find out and fix it. As for neighbor complaints about smell and noise, these are already covered in the existing animal codes.

I am for barrier regulation when we are trying to help reduce major problems in society, not when we are trying to promote a positive aspect (some may argue that chickens are a negative but to me, the positives tip the scale disproportionately in the favor of the girlies). By barriers I mean that we are making it somewhat more difficult to have chickens than before instead of easier. Like I said before, the only thing we won in the compromise is the numbers of chickens one can have and the fact that most of these rules are mostly common sense. But still. It’s the idea behind it. Would you like to be told that in order to raise your dog, someone would have to come look at your backyard, make sure the dog house was the right color or where to store your dog food? It just reeks of superiority complex (or job security?) -even in the most harmless of matters. I mean, how long have people been raising chickens in society? Do we really need all these rules? Yet again, it seems, that everything I want to do is illegal.

Well, enough of my rant. We are happy to keep our girls and probably come January we will schlep on over to the city of Greeley’s office to file for a permit for our chickens, wait for an inspector, and hope that they grant us approval  (oh, please city, please won’t you let us keep our pets?). Before that time however, the city of Greeley and the city council will be voting on this and maybe making changes to the proposed ordinance. I will keep you posted.  And if you are around Greeley, tomorrow, I will be on Pirate 104.7 again at 7:30am talking about it. You can stream the show here.

And here’s a funny video of the chickens playing in the snow of our yard:

What do you think of this post?
  • WOW (0)
  • Awesome (0)
  • Interesting (0)
  • Useful (0)
  • Bummer (0)
  • Whoa (0)

It’s WHO you know

The society we humans have created is an interesting one. We have our set of rules and those rules were put in place by our fellow citizens. When you know the people in charge you have some influence on them in some way or another. I think Cassie and I have lived in the Greeley area long enough  to realize that sometimes (in fact, oftentimes) it’s not what you know, but who you know.

It’s true with the Chicken issue because we know how the local law system works and who is in charge of it. We approached the Greeley city council about our ticket and the problem just….went away. I don’t think a lot of people know how it works and are frustrated constantly (hint: always go to the top first, the worker bees at the bottom represent the bureaucracy and often have their hands tied and can’t really help you unless told to by those at the top).

We had another example happen tonight. We have a rental in Evans and some friends of ours live there. Everything has worked out great and has really been a pleasure. Well tonight I got a call from them and apparently the water had been shut off (we pay water). I was kind of shocked but I remembered that we had a letter from the utility company a few months ago that said they had a SNAFU with their new water billing system. We had followed the instructions they sent to us but apparently it didn’t work.

water

Of course it was after hours (about 6pm) and nobody who could do anything was at work. We thought we were going to have to wait until 8am tomorrow to do anything about it. I tried calling everyone I could think of. I even called the lady at home who works in the billing department that sent us the letter. Her husband informed me she was at a meeting. I was about to give up.

Then I remembered the guy who did a house inspection for us was on the city council in Evans. I thought it was a long shot, but worth a try. I called him and he was very receptive to my issue. Apparently the utility company messed his bill up too! He called the city manager and the water was back on in less than an hour. Amazing. I am truly thankful for his assistance in the matter (thanks Tom Hamblen!). You don’t realize how important water is until you try to turn the faucet on and nothing comes out!

If you know who to call and who can make a difference it can sure help. I think our elected officials helping out the people is exactly what they should be doing. It’s nice to see on a local level that it still works like that (sometimes). Of course they also have an opportunity to help out those that aren’t doing what is best for the people. It can really go both ways. Either way, squeaky wheel gets the grease.  So don’t be afraid to squeak a little to the right people!

What do you think of this post?
  • WOW (0)
  • Awesome (0)
  • Interesting (0)
  • Useful (0)
  • Bummer (0)
  • Whoa (0)

Gov Ritter’s Amendment 35 Budget Cuts May Cost Me My Job

About a week and a half ago we heard news that Colorado Governor Bill Ritter was going to make a big announcement about budget cuts in order to balance the budget that is $320 million in the hole. What was worrisome was that he was eying Amendment 35 monies to help fill it (among many other programs). Colorado Amendment 35 is the tobacco excise tax that was voted and approved in 2004 to go to health programs and specifically to combat the burden of tobacco in our community. It is also how my program at the health department is funded to do comprehensive, population based work to address the tobacco tolls in our local community.

budgetcuts

Well, he made the announcement that they would be looking to cut $7 million from the STEPP -State Tobacco Education and Prevention Partnership- portion of A35. That means that his budget cuts could cost me my job!  This is after they already took $8 million earlier this year.  If they were to take an across the board cut that would mean about a 57% cut to all grantees. This is not the worst of it though. They underestimated the amount in grant reversions that would return to the state and so they are now looking at approximately $10 million in cuts. Then, lo and behold, maybe the estimates for the 09-10 year are low too, so let’s plan on $13 million. Sure, why not. That’s only an 80% cut.

What I don’t understand is why they allowed for the loophole which lets them use tobacco tax funds in a “declared fiscal crisis” to go to the general fund. The people who wrote Amendment 23 for K-12 education were smart and didn’t allow for that kind of pilfering.

The tobacco companies must be laughing their heads off. This seems like deja vu to the Master Settlement fiasco where they did a similar tactic and securitized funds that were meant to offset the health care costs from tobacco use and used them in general fund projects like building roads.

Anyway, our  fate will be decided on October 1st with stop-work orders probably being issued. There is no way with an 80% cut that FTE can be spared as it -mostly- was with the 8 million dollar cut. It seems crazy that in order to “balance the budget” you would create so much unemployment in its wake that will have to be paid out from some other pot (Federal and State Unemployment). What’s the saying? Rob Peter to pay Paul? I think that’s about what it comes down to. Take from a program that is funding itself -and voter approved- to pay for programs that don’t (and aren’t).

Britton and I have been talking about what this could mean for our Puerto Rico plans. It could either mean going there much sooner or much later depending on how we work it. We have to look at challenges like this as opportunities. If we don’t we could go crazy trying to figure out the insane “logic” behind decisions like this.

What do you think of this post?
  • WOW (0)
  • Awesome (0)
  • Interesting (0)
  • Useful (0)
  • Bummer (0)
  • Whoa (0)

Greeley Urban Hens Editorial

Tonight is our meeting with the Greeley Urban Hen Coalition. We will decide our formal name at the meeting. But we also had some more press regarding having chickens in Greeley! Our new friend, Jessica Harris, who was also interviewed in the article that Britton and I were in, was the featured editorial guest columnist in the newspaper yesterday.  Here is a link to the editorial, as well as a reprint. I thought she did a great job and loved the comparison to the amount of room people live in on a daily basis to the amount supposedly “required” for chickens.

Chicken Picture
¡Viva La Gallina! Long Live the Hen!

Here is the article as printed in the newspaper. For an unabridged version, check out the urban hen website.

Greeley Policy on Hens is Fowl by Jessica Harris

I recently inquired at the city of Greeley concerning the possibility of keeping laying hens (no roosters) on my property, as I’m interested in learning more about self-sustained and natural living. I’ve a good-sized back yard with plenty of space for a large coop and completely enclosed pen. I also thought it was a good idea, considering the tough economic times, to learn how to be more self-sufficient. While I’ve no interest in butchering a chicken, the thought of fresh, chemical- and hormone-free eggs, combined with an interesting pet, intrigued me.

The practice of backyard chicken rearing has become popular in many urban towns in the past few years. Cities such as Fort Collins, Loveland and Boulder have recently passed ordinances allowing hens to be kept in residentS’ back yards.

Being excited about the prospect of my own “urban hens,” I immediately did what any reasonable person would do — I researched. I literally obsessed over every piece of information I could find on keeping chickens within the city. I also carefully read the Greeley Municipal Ordinances referring to livestock (or specifically the ordinance on fowl). I saw no reason, or law, that would prevent me from properly and legally keeping two or three well-cared for pet hens in my backyard with the appropriate pen and coop.

Apparently, I was wrong. My family found this out while doing the right thing and calling the office of city planning, just to make sure. We were told was that while yes, it’s acceptable to own chickens per the animal ordinance of city codes, under chapter 18.58.030 of the Municipal Codes, this allowance becomes reliant upon figures that would allow literally no one (without a yard that could rival your local mansion) to own laying hens within city limits. The figure that I was given by the office of City Planning is 4,326 square feet of unused land per chicken. Just for reference, this is approximately 385 times the suggested square footage necessary to keep a single chicken as per just about any poultry site, hatchery, association, or expert out there deems necessary. It’s also about 1,000 square feet bigger than I fit a family of four humans, three dogs and a cat in and call home.

I understand that the land usage bit had most likely been tacked on in an effort to keep people from creating bizarre barnyard hovels in their duplex parking lots. But that doesn’t keep me from being angered and disappointed that this “stipulation” also prohibits those of us who are responsible pet owners, who understand the benefits of raising backyard hens for pets, healthy eggs, mineral rich, natural fertilizer and insect control, from doing so.

In all the years that I’ve lived in this town, I’ve heard repeatedly about Greeley’s “hometown attitude,” “pioneer spirit” and “rich agricultural roots.” Yet, as a resident of Greeley, it would seem I’m not really allowed to be a part of any of that. Nor am I allowed to make any attempt at self-sustained, natural living unless, of course, I can afford that extra lot or buy a farm.

I’m starting to think that we don’t live in such an agri-centric town after all. We can have our cow-painted mailboxes, or slippers or other assorted household items, and we can go to the Greeley Stampede and play cowboy for a day, but unless you have a yard the size of Nottingham Field, don’t expect to take an active role in that agricultural heritage we are supposed to be so proud of and not mind when the air is “not so fresh.”

Jessica Harris is a Greeley resident, a mother of two, an avid animal lover and a writer.

What do you think of this post?
  • WOW (0)
  • Awesome (0)
  • Interesting (0)
  • Useful (0)
  • Bummer (0)
  • Whoa (0)